home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text>
- <title>
- California Committee and LA Office
- </title>
- <article>
- <hdr>
- Human Rights Watch World Report 1992
- Human Rights Watch: The California Committee and the Los Angeles
- Office
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Nineteen ninety-one was the second full year of operation
- for the Los Angeles office of Human Rights Watch. The office
- opened in May 1989 to complement the work of the California
- Committee of Human Rights Watch--a group of concerned
- Californians who actively promote and participate in our work.
- The Los Angeles office is responsible for the research on Mexico
- and the U.S.-Mexican border area performed by Americas Watch.
- The office also sponsors educational programs on international
- human rights in Los Angeles and San Francisco, and is available
- to carry out research and campaign tasks for all components of
- Human Rights Watch.
- </p>
- <p> Research on Mexico continued to be the cornerstone of the
- Los Angeles office's work in 1991. Two reports were produced:
- Prison Conditions in Mexico and Unceasing Abuses: Human Rights
- in Mexico One Year After the Introduction of Reforms. Both
- received substantial press coverage in Mexico and contributed
- to prodding the Mexican government to intensify human rights
- reforms. In March, the office prepared testimony on human rights
- in Mexico which was presented to the Senate Subcommittee on
- Western Hemisphere Affairs. In October, a representative from
- the office spoke at the U.S.-Mexico Center of the University of
- California at San Diego on human rights in Mexico one year after
- the introduction of reforms. Also in October, an office
- representative addressed the newly formed Mexican National
- Association of Democratic Lawyers about documenting human
- rights abuses.
- </p>
- <p> During 1991 Human Rights Watch, through the Los Angeles
- office, joined the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern
- California in litigation against the estate of Ferdinand Marcos
- on behalf of three victims of human rights abuses in the
- Philippines during his presidency. The cases are precedent-
- setting because they are the first human rights cases under the
- Alien Tort Claims Act that are scheduled to go to trial on
- their merits.
- </p>
- <p> The Los Angeles office helped to prepare briefs for and
- participated in key hearings on the case in January, July and
- October. In April, Human Rights Watch participated in
- depositions in New York of Imelda Marcos and her son Ferdinand
- Romauldez Marcos. In May, an office representative traveled to
- Manila for three weeks to gather evidence for the litigation.
- In October, Human Rights Watch, under the direction of the Los
- Angeles office, filed an amicus curiae brief in Trajano v.
- Marcos; a parallel case to Sison v. Marcos. The brief
- challenged an attempt to limit the scope of the Alien Tort
- Claims Act to prevent damage suits for gross abuses committed
- abroad.
- </p>
- <p> Research continued on abuses by the U.S. Border Parol and by
- other agencies of the Immigration and Naturalization Service
- (INS) during the arrest and detention of undocumented aliens in
- the United States. A report is scheduled for release in early
- 1992.
- </p>
- <p> During its research on INS abuses, the office learned of a
- case in which Border Patrol agents used torture to elicit
- information from two Guatemalan men who had entered the United
- States without inspection. According to the men, Border Patrol
- agents in Falfurrias, Texas used a cattle prod on one of them
- and threatened to rape him with it; both men were severely
- beaten. Through the efforts of the Los Angeles office, Human
- Rights Watch has joined Texas Rural Legal Aid (TRLA) in
- representing the men. TRLA will handle their lawsuit against
- the individual agents, while Human Rights Watch, in cooperation
- with volunteer attorneys in Texas, will assume responsibility
- for their Federal Tort Claims Act proceedings against the INS.
- </p>
- <p> The Los Angeles office filed Freedom of Information Act
- requests on behalf of Antonio Valenzia Fontes, a Mexican
- lawyer, and four others who were detained, tortured and held
- incommunicado for five days before being officially "arrested"
- on trumped-up drug charges. The five men allege that U.S. law
- enforcement agents were present during their torture, and that
- in two cases, the torture was stopped to allow the U.S. agents
- to interrogate the men, and then resumed. (For more on this
- case, see the chapter on Mexico.)
- </p>
- <p> In February, the Los Angeles office prepared a memorandum on
- freedom of expression during political campaigns. The research
- was incorporated into a letter from Helsinki Watch calling on
- the Polish Helsinki Committee to withdraw its support for the
- prosecution of losing presidential candidate Stanislaw
- Tyminski. Tyminski was charged with "publicly insulting,
- ridiculing and deriding the Polish Nation" under laws that dated
- from Poland's repressive past.
- </p>
- <p> During June and July, several members of the California
- Committee participated in visits to four jails and prisons in
- Southern California and contributed to the Human Rights Watch
- Prison Project's comprehensive nationwide report, Prison
- Conditions in the United States.
- </p>
- <p> In September, a California Committee member served as a
- public member of the U.S. delegation to the Moscow meeting of
- the Conference on the Human Dimension, part of the Conference
- on Security and Cooperation in Europe. In addition to working
- to promote human rights through the U.S. delegation, she
- participated in independent activities organized by Helsinki
- Watch in Moscow at the time.
- </p>
- <p> As part of its public education program, the California
- Committee and Los Angeles office helped to organize several
- well attended events. In January, Fang Lizhi, China's most
- prominent astrophysicist and outspoken human rights activist,
- was our guest for a series of public and private meetings in Los
- Angeles and San Francisco. In April, Andrew Whitley, just back
- from a fact-finding mission to Kuwait, made presentations in
- both cities. In May, Holly Burkhalter spoke to members of the
- California Committee on Human Rights Watch's work in
- Washington. In October, Jose Zalaquet, a distinguished lawyer
- and longtime human rights activist from Chile, and Juan Méndez,
- executive director of Americas Watch, addressed a small
- gathering in San Francisco. Aryeh Neier, executive director of
- Human Rights Watch, was the featured speaker at the California
- Committee's November annual meeting.
- </p>
- <p> Jane Olson and Stanley Sheinbaum are co-chairs of the
- California Committee. Its Executive Committee includes Raquel
- Ackerman, Mike Farrell, Paul Hoffman, Joseph and Donna LaBonte,
- Daniel Levy, Lynda Palevsky, Lucille Polachek, Clara A. "Zazi"
- Pope, Hon. Phillip R. Trimble, Francis Wheat and Diane
- Wittenberg. The remainder of the California Committee is
- composed of Lynn Alvarez, Edward Asner, Geoffrey Cowen, Dolores
- A. Donovan, Sandy Elster, Brenda Freiberg, Jonathan M. Gordon,
- Arthur N. Greenberg, Kristin Hubbard, Lucy Hubbard, Rosanne
- Keynan, Clifford L. Klein, Abraham F. Lowenthal, Beatriz Manz,
- Felicia Marcus, Hon. Dorothy W. Neslon, Hon. James F. Nelson,
- Steven A. Nissen, Claire Pollack, Cruz Reynoso, David W.
- Rintels, Vicki Riskin Rintels, Ramona Ripston, William
- Rothbard, Orville Schell, Pippa Scott, Nancy Wheat, Stanley
- Wolpert and Zohreh Zarnegar.
- </p>
- <p> Ellen L. Lutz is the California director of Human Rights
- Watch and heads the Los Angeles office. Jean Hessburg is the
- outreach coordinator and Colleen Rafferty is an associate.
- Eugene Chao and Rudy Guyon were full-time law-student interns
- who assisted with Sison v. Marcos and other projects. Ivan
- Arrellanes is a research intern who assists with work on Mexico.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-